Even though most cases tend to end at the settlement stage, your Coral Springs accident attorney wants you to know about the trial as well to remain prepared. They will represent you to success even when your case reaches the trial stage. The first step is the selection of the jury and next comes the opening statements that both the parties make to get the upper hand from the initial stages. Sometimes, multiple parties might also remain involved in the personal injury cases and here, the attorneys representing the parties will give their own opening arguments. The third stage is the cross examination and the witness testimony. At this time, both the sides involved will present key arguments and evidence to jury.
Coral Springs accident attorney will provide the necessary evidence to convince jury members regarding the legal responsibility of the defendant for the damages and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. Also, they will call experts and witnesses to testify that might strengthen the case. Introduction of the physical evidence also happens that this stage and this includes the medical reports, photographs, and the documents. Documentary evidence and expert testimony becomes necessary in medical malpractice or the claims involving defective products. Witness testimony involves swearing in, direct examination to elicit information via Q&A for strengthening the position of the party in a dispute.
Following the direct examination Coral Springs accident attorney representing the opposition party would cross-examine the witness they will try their best to pinpoint holes in the story of the witness, attacking credibility and discrediting the overall testimony. Following the cross examination the original side that called witness the second opportunity of questioning through the redirect examination. This is their chance of trying to remedy cross-examination damaging effects. Once the plaintiff side concludes, defendants would present evidence proactively to show that they are not liable in any way.
According to Coral Springs accident attorney, they will call witnesses to prove their side of the story along with presentation of independent evidence for downplaying or refuting key elements associated with the legal allegations brought by the plaintiff. After the defense rest, the plaintiff side would response to the arguments presented by the defense through rebuttal where they may contradict the evidence presented by the defense. At this stage, they cannot present any new arguments though. The defense might also get a chance of responding to prosecutions rebuttal. After this, both the sides would rest and this means that there will be no more presentation of the evidence before the making of the closing arguments.
Coral Springs accident attorney would make closing arguments were both parties get a chance of summing up cases recapping evidence favorable to respective positions. Prior to the deliberations, this is the last chance for parties when it comes to addressing the jury. Visit Here: Drucker Law Offices
Coral Springs accident attorney will provide the necessary evidence to convince jury members regarding the legal responsibility of the defendant for the damages and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. Also, they will call experts and witnesses to testify that might strengthen the case. Introduction of the physical evidence also happens that this stage and this includes the medical reports, photographs, and the documents. Documentary evidence and expert testimony becomes necessary in medical malpractice or the claims involving defective products. Witness testimony involves swearing in, direct examination to elicit information via Q&A for strengthening the position of the party in a dispute.
Following the direct examination Coral Springs accident attorney representing the opposition party would cross-examine the witness they will try their best to pinpoint holes in the story of the witness, attacking credibility and discrediting the overall testimony. Following the cross examination the original side that called witness the second opportunity of questioning through the redirect examination. This is their chance of trying to remedy cross-examination damaging effects. Once the plaintiff side concludes, defendants would present evidence proactively to show that they are not liable in any way.
According to Coral Springs accident attorney, they will call witnesses to prove their side of the story along with presentation of independent evidence for downplaying or refuting key elements associated with the legal allegations brought by the plaintiff. After the defense rest, the plaintiff side would response to the arguments presented by the defense through rebuttal where they may contradict the evidence presented by the defense. At this stage, they cannot present any new arguments though. The defense might also get a chance of responding to prosecutions rebuttal. After this, both the sides would rest and this means that there will be no more presentation of the evidence before the making of the closing arguments.
Coral Springs accident attorney would make closing arguments were both parties get a chance of summing up cases recapping evidence favorable to respective positions. Prior to the deliberations, this is the last chance for parties when it comes to addressing the jury. Visit Here: Drucker Law Offices
